<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Demi Moore wants children with Ashton Kutcher</title>
	<link>http://www.hotmommagossip.com/2008/01/16/demi-moore-wants-children-with-ashton-kutcher/</link>
	<description>Hot Celebrity Gossip News and Drama</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 02:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mohsen</title>
		<link>http://www.hotmommagossip.com/2008/01/16/demi-moore-wants-children-with-ashton-kutcher/#comment-195838</link>
		<dc:creator>mohsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 11:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hotmommagossip.com/2008/01/16/demi-moore-wants-children-with-ashton-kutcher/#comment-195838</guid>
		<description>mohsen  to dear demi 
it is not important other what say but you enjoy ur husband and produce baby......f**king is good at  45 yr old  i think.her body id beautifull.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mohsen  to dear demi<br />
it is not important other what say but you enjoy ur husband and produce baby&#8230;&#8230;f**king is good at  45 yr old  i think.her body id beautifull.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krissy</title>
		<link>http://www.hotmommagossip.com/2008/01/16/demi-moore-wants-children-with-ashton-kutcher/#comment-136739</link>
		<dc:creator>Krissy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hotmommagossip.com/2008/01/16/demi-moore-wants-children-with-ashton-kutcher/#comment-136739</guid>
		<description>Kat,
I don't think its really that anyone is against Demi and Ashton reproducing.  But c'mon.  At 45, Demi is getting a bit old.....not to mention the gal has had plastic surgery up the ying yang.  
And just as a note....I think old men having babies with young women is gross too.  Not to mention slightly irresponsible.  Why bring a child into the world, if you can't enjoy it.  Would a 50 yr old woman REALLY have the energy level to keep up to a 2 yr old?  Would a 65 yr old man?  There comes a point where reproducing gets to be just wrong due to age.  

In general, I think its just wrong.  Demi is getting to be too old to have a newborn baby.  JMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kat,<br />
I don&#8217;t think its really that anyone is against Demi and Ashton reproducing.  But c&#8217;mon.  At 45, Demi is getting a bit old&#8230;..not to mention the gal has had plastic surgery up the ying yang.<br />
And just as a note&#8230;.I think old men having babies with young women is gross too.  Not to mention slightly irresponsible.  Why bring a child into the world, if you can&#8217;t enjoy it.  Would a 50 yr old woman REALLY have the energy level to keep up to a 2 yr old?  Would a 65 yr old man?  There comes a point where reproducing gets to be just wrong due to age.  </p>
<p>In general, I think its just wrong.  Demi is getting to be too old to have a newborn baby.  JMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KAT</title>
		<link>http://www.hotmommagossip.com/2008/01/16/demi-moore-wants-children-with-ashton-kutcher/#comment-136658</link>
		<dc:creator>KAT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hotmommagossip.com/2008/01/16/demi-moore-wants-children-with-ashton-kutcher/#comment-136658</guid>
		<description>AND WHAT EXACTLY IS WRONG WITH A WOMAN WANTING CHILDREN FROM HER HUSBAND? I BET IF IT WERE AN OLDER MAN WITH A MUCH YOUNGER WIFE, SUCH A BIG DEAL WOULD NOT BE MADE! RATHER, HE WOULD BE CALLED A "STUD"!! AGE BIGOTS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AND WHAT EXACTLY IS WRONG WITH A WOMAN WANTING CHILDREN FROM HER HUSBAND? I BET IF IT WERE AN OLDER MAN WITH A MUCH YOUNGER WIFE, SUCH A BIG DEAL WOULD NOT BE MADE! RATHER, HE WOULD BE CALLED A &#8220;STUD&#8221;!! AGE BIGOTS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.614 seconds -->
