Tom & Katie go to lunch…WITHOUT THE BABY!
Posted on September 7th, 2006 by Hot Momma


Tom & Katie have a lunch date with Katie’s mom. You’d think that since baby Suri has finally been revealed to the world, that Tom and Katie would at least let the poor child see the light of day..but apparently not.
Photos:X17
Older (Possibly) Related Posts:

She’s so skinny after the baby. I wish I could lose my baby weight that easily!
eh, i see your point HM but in reality there arent a whole lot of celebrities that cart their babies all over town when they have the money to pay someone else to care for them.
Katie looks great! (even if she is a foot taller than her husband, lol).
why do they always wear the dark glasses? is it to hide their alien eyes?? also, i could use a nanny now and then but when my babies were little i didn’t not want to be away from them. of course i wasn’t being hounded by photographers everytime i left the house.
I wouldn’t bring my baby out with all the crap that is going on. How safe would it be??? Who’s gonna be the first person to get the picture of their 1st outing together. Thats next right now that everyone has seen her.
Because there is no baby! That’s why they are out and about without her..I still think it’s a sham! Did anyone see Tom on David Letterman when she was first born..he couldn’t even answer the questions. Dave would ask something and he would say, “Well you know how it is…” followed by some lame line that was rehearsed! Go to YouTube.com and check it out! I am convinced, now after seeing that, that you guys are right - there’s no Suri!
And one more thing…we all look thin in the legs when we point our toes in - what’s up with that anyone? Did she learn that from Paris Hilton..do they know how odd they look when they stand like that?
# 3 - They can’t bring Suri out because (a) she requires so much Photoshopping she is hideous in the light or (b) Suri’s real mother took her back to Asia!
#4 - Why does she insist on wearing heels when she is so much taller than him?
OMG, who said Katie could wear heels, she’s making Tom look like a midget…no wait a minute I take that back.
She’s all legs, what guy wouldn’t like those long legs wrapped around him?????
I agree with 9:25……….the frenzy that baby would cause isn’t worth it!
More publicity stunts. I’m sorry, Katie doesn’t look great, I think she’s aged and looks awful.
Quite frankly, I doubt we ever see the baby again. They just used her as a publicity stunt. How sad is that? Maybe I’m wrong, bur I don’t think so. Just my opinion.
Katie can wear heels if she wants - screw crazy Tom!
11:31, I agree with you BIG TIME! I think it will be a cold, frozen day in Hell before we ever see that kid again.
I wonder if they will lie to her about her own birthday, just to keep their twisted little secret??
What’s the deal with their moms being around all the time lately?
okay so, i think that some of you guys are right by saying that bringing the baby out is not the best idea for safety reasons. i also believe that part of it is the fact that tom is such a control FREAK…controls everyone, everything, at all times right? well, he can’t control suri. if she wants to cry she’s gonna cry and i’ll bet that he doesn’t want her crying in fear that it may make him look bad because he can’t control her and make her stop crying.
I was on another gossip site and they had side by side photos of Suri and Chris Klein… let’s just say I now know where her eye shape comes from! Suri HAS to be his kid! This other site also mentioned how if Suri is really Chris’ kid, she would have been born in Jan., and how there weren’t ANY photos of Katie around that time…kinda makes you wonder, huh??
we saw first pics of shiloh and then nothing since, but no ones dogging them, they has shown us suri and were still not happy! what more do we want!
forget the baby … do they go anywhere or do anything without his mom or sister? sheesh!! grow up tom!!
The reason they went out to lunch without the baby is because there is no baby, i don’t care whether pictures were released or not, the main point is that the baby was not seen in public in 4 months and that’s impossible, for any baby.