Celebrity News
OMG! Could it be?
Read More: Celebrity News
HotMomma is in no way verifying that this is indeed Katie Holmes and baby Suri..but the resemblence is very good..What do you think?
The gossip mill is also stirring about these pics of Katie..apparently she and Tom Cruise had just gotten a huge fight over hiring a Scientologist nanny. Katie threw a fit, left the house, went to Barneys and headed over to a church…a CATHOLIC church to seek some refuge.
Ooh..it’s getting hot in herrrr…
Photos:X17online & ONTD
I think it’s a fake, the baby looks a bit big for a 3 month old, but hey, I haven’t had a baby in years…
And I certainly hope Katie would know how to hold Suri right.
RUN KATIE!!
That baby is way too big to be a 3 month old.
that is SO not Katie Holmes for one thing. and i agree, the head on that baby is too big for a 3 month old.
so these pics are very fake, it is obvious.
She supposedly has a head of dark hair.
I say its not her. After all this time of keeping her away from the camera I doubt she will just walk right out with her in her arms like that.
I saw this on some other Popculture website….They state that it is a SHAM…Something about not being able to see Katies other arm or some crap like that…They are probably hiding Suri becuase she isn’t as pretty as the other celeb. babies…They have to figure that if they don’t show the photo soon the PAP. are going to be hardballing it to capture the first photo of her which in turn can be dangerous..I am just fed up with the whole Suri this and Suri that…Who cares…..LOL
That baby is either bald or blond. Suri supposedly has lots of dark hair. I vote fake.
Eek, I say fake. It’s just not right…
Tom said she had a head full of thick black hair……..fake
It seems weird to me to be carrying a 3 month old to a car instead of having her in an infant carrier regardless of who the baby/mom is . . .
That’s not Suri, Katie’s arms are not that thin either. I’m going with FAKE!
You’re right, people carrying babies is just crazy. I wonder what we did before we had padded buckets to carry them in. I mean, you’d have to actually touch the smelly things!
i love how no one has pointed out that katie’s “head” has been photoshopped in from another picture! hee!
Katie looks a little awkward holding this child. Usually new mothers look quite comfy with their babies, especially after bonding and what not. Interesting…
That pic is so freakin photoshopped people…please.
If that’s supposed to be her car, it’s not her. I’m pretty sure Mr. & Mrs. Cruise don’t drive a Buick.
i saw that exact “picture” of katie with a different background on another sight. thats definitely not her and the baby.
The baby seems too big to me, plus Tom has said on numerous occasions that Suri had TONS of hair….this baby doesn’t seem to have any!
I agree…there is no way she would be carrying the baby like that! Seriously..although with the few sightings and the fact that she is out without her all the time..she might not even know how to carry a baby! ha ha!
is that how you carry a baby? whoever that is – she looks like she’s holding one of those “pull my string” baby dolls. how wierd!
so fake… that is so a cabbage patch kid. at least, for katie’s sake they’d better be fake, otherwise social services would peg her for an unfit mother.
I can’t believe “Kate” doesn’t get yeast infections from her always way way too-tight jeans.
that kid is huge
I thought they said the baby had a head full of dark brown hair! Umm…that baby in the picture looks almost bald.
Not her and if it is she is carrying one of those ugly bald headed baby dolls you can buy at your local Wal-Mart for 11.99…HEY you too can have your own baby Suri doll! How fun!
You guys are such douchebags. They said she had dark brown hair when she was born, my niece was the same way. Now her hair is almost blonde. Babies change, they don’t stay the same. She’s also only four months old and she’s a pretty big baby, so that could definitely be Suri.
She’s not too big to be a three month old.